Beasley v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
I. Introduction
In this case we affirm a $5,227,617 judgment in a class action which challenged Wells Fargo Bank’s assessment of fees against credit card customers who failed to make timely payments or exceeded their credit limits.
We hold as follows: (1) although there is no right to a jury trial on an affirmative claim for relief from liquidated damages, a jury trial was proper here because the plaintiffs sought defensive relief by opposing a cross-complaint; (2) the judge erred in submitting to the jury the legal question whether the challenged fees were valid as liquidated…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Morris v. Redwood Empire BancorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- California Grocers Assn. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.