Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Wells Fargo Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1991No. A048490PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

I. Introduction

In this case we affirm a $5,227,617 judgment in a class action which challenged Wells Fargo Bank’s assessment of fees against credit card customers who failed to make timely payments or exceeded their credit limits.

We hold as follows: (1) although there is no right to a jury trial on an affirmative claim for relief from liquidated damages, a jury trial was proper here because the plaintiffs sought defensive relief by opposing a cross-complaint; (2) the judge erred in submitting to the jury the legal question whether the challenged fees were valid as liquidated…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Morris v. Redwood Empire BancorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. California Grocers Assn. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API