Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Norton
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1973No. Civ. 41380PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
Plaintiff 1 sued for breach of a written contract for the purchases of corporate stock. After a nonjury trial, he recovered judgment. Defendants have appealed; we affirm.
I
We first consider a procedural matter which lies at the heart of the trial court’s jurisdiction.
The action is a simple 2 action for breach of a written contract. It was filed on July 12, 1971. On August 10, 1971, defendants filed their answer. On October 8, 1971, defendants filed a demand for jury trial. That filing was reflected on the register of actions, but, for reasons unexplained and apparently…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by10 opinions
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Imperial County Behavioral Health Services v. Joseph W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cadle Co. v. World Wide Hospitality Furniture, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- McIntosh v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.