Legal Opinion
State v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 18, 1974No. 7421SC694PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Petitioner contends the court erred in entering an order forfeiting his vehicle without giving him notice and hearing prior to the order of forfeiture.
Petitioner’s vehicle was confiscated pursuant to G.S. 90-112 (a) (4) which subjects the following to forfeiture:
“All conveyances, including vehicles, vessels, or aircraft, which are used or intended for use to unlawfully conceal, convey, or transport, or in any manner to facilitate the unlawful concealment, conveyance, or transportation of property described in (1) or (2) .... ”
G.S. 90-112(f) provides:
“All conveyances subject to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Genelle Weathersbee and Esther B. Ram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Fell v. ArmourDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
- United States v. Earl William MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- State v. McPeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- C. I. T Corporation v. . BurgessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.