Legal Opinion

State v. Meyers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1980No. 794SC950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Among other things petitioner argues on appeal that to allow the forfeiture of his car under the circumstances of this case will result in a deprivation of his property without due process of law. He bases this argument on his observation that the “undisputed” evidence of record “shows that he did not know Timothy Meyers or Timothy Mosley and never authorized them to use his car for any purpose whatsoever.”

While our statutes authorize the immediate forfeiture of vehicles used in the illegal transportation of controlled substances, see G.S. §§ 90-112 and 18A-21, the power is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McPeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. O'HoraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. One 1978 Chevrolet Van, Model CG21305 v. County of Churchill Ex Rel. BanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API