Legal Opinion

C. I. T Corporation v. . Burgess

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

T. B. Drake is not a party to this action. He bought the car on credit from the plaintiff, secured the deferred payments by a note and chattel mortgage on the property, made default, and used the vehicle for the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor. The chattel mortgage was not registered in Buncombe or in any other county; there was no' irregularity in the sale; and the defendant was a purchaser without actual or constructive notice of the plaintiff’s claim. Both before and after his conviction Drake told the judge of the recorder’s court and the sheriff that there was no lien on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Bunn v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API