Legal Opinion
Vives v. Rodriguez
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-2728PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Asteria Vives (“Asteria”) sues defendants Frank (“Frank”) and Miguelina (“Miguelina”) Rodriguez,1 asserting claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Frank is Asteria’s brother, while Miguelina is Frank’s wife and Asteria’s sister-in-law. Asteria’s claims arise out of an alleged agreement between her and the defendants that provided the defendants would act for a fee as the straw purchasers and re-sellers of a house Asteria wanted to dispose of. According to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Diodato v. Wells Fargo Insurance Services, USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Mendelsohn, Drucker & Associates v. Titan Atlas Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sköld v. Galderma Laboratories, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Wen v. WillisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.