Legal Opinion
Mendelsohn, Drucker & Associates v. Titan Atlas Manufacturing, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 12-453PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BAYLSON, District Judge.
1. Introduction
This case involves claims of breach of contract1 and common law fraudulent inducement arising out of a client’s failure to pay legal fees. Plaintiff is the law firm Mendelsohn, Drucker & Associates (“Mendelsohn”) and Defendants are Titan Atlas Manufacturing (“Titan”) and its CEO Jeremy Blackburn (“Blackburn”). Mendelsohn brings claims of breach of contract and fraudulent inducement against Titan as well as a claim of fraudulent inducement against Blackburn in his individual capacity-
Presently before the court…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Telwell Inc. v. Grandbridge Real Estate Capital LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Sodexomagic, LLC v. Drexel Univ.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Ludwig & Robinson, PLLC v. BiotechPharma, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.