Legal Opinion

Wen v. Willis

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 2015No. Civil Action No. 15-1328PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Handong Wen alleges that he was induced by Defendants Foxcode, Inc. (“Foxcode”) and its principal Robert Willis (collectively, the “Defendants”) to invest $4 million in a fraudulent scheme. Wen alleges that he invested money with Foxcode and Willis in a limited liability company created by the parties for Wen’s benefit, but that Foxcode and Willis instead siphoned off most of his investment for their own personal use and profit. He brings seven claims under federal and state securities laws, as well as common law. Before the Court is the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. v. SchadenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Atlantic Holdings, Ltd. v. Apollo Metals, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Rocky Aspen Management 204 LLC v. Hanford Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. BRUNO v. ROUNDHOUSE CYCLES, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Bittner Family LP v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API