Legal Opinion

John Bright Shoe Stores Co. v. Scully

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The original action in the common pleas court of Lucas county was one for malicious prosecution, and upon trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,000. After overruling the motion and supplemental motion for new trial, the court entered a judgment on the verdict, and the defendant below, by this proceeding in error, seeks a reversal of that judgment.

Plaintiff below, Arthur J. Scully, was manager of a shoe store for the defendant company, and, between the time of closing the store on one Saturday night and the time of opening the store on the following…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. MastellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Bruley v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ray v. City Bank & Trust Co. of Natchez, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
  2. Vesey v. ConnallyOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. William Sessoms v. The Union Savings & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Ottawa County Commissioners v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Steinbarger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API