Legal Opinion
Ray v. City Bank & Trust Co. of Natchez, Mississippi
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 9, 1973No. Civ. 71-210PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
A. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This diversity action was instituted by the plaintiff, Louis M. Ray, a Louisiana resident, against The City Bank and Trust Company of Natchez, Mississippi, and Robert C. Hartenbach, Sheriff of Meigs County, Ohio. The complaint sounds in tort and alleges the wrongful attachment of plaintiff’s oil drilling equipment. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under Title 28, United States Code Annotated, Section 1332. After non-jury trial conducted on December 14 and 15, 1972, and upon the pleadings, briefs and exhibits submitted by the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- King-Porter Company v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Michigan National Bank v. MarstonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Hitchcock v. Board of Home MissionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Harris v. CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1843
- Bank of N. America v. Bank of NutleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson National Bank (In Re I.A. Durbin, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1985
- Mitchell v. Rock Hill National Bank (In Re Mid-Atlantic Piping Products of Charlotte, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1982
- In The Matter Of Tri-State Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- First State Bank v. Shirley Ag Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- J. Aron & Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.