Legal Opinion

Bruley v. Rose

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 1882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Hardin Circuit Court. Action for malicious prosecution. There was a trial by jury, and verdict and j; tdgment were rendered for the plaintiff again s t the defendant Eose. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant Rose filed an information before a justice of the peace of Hardin county, accusing the plaintiff Bruley of the crime of larceny. A warrant was issued and served by the defendant Waid, as special constable. A bearing having been bad, Bruley was discharged. He brings this *652action for damages, averring that the defendants, knowing him to be innocent, maliciously caused his arrest and prosecution.

l.rnnDGEUarpledgor.137 The information filed by Rose charged Bruley with the larceny of a span of horses. Rose was, at one time, the owner of the horses, and made a sale of them to Bruley…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belden v. PerkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hutton v. ArnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. People v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Palmer v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  5. State v. QuickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Voss v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Shoemaker v. SELNESOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Granteer v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. State v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API