Legal Opinion

Ottawa County Commissioners v. Mitchell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1984No. OT-84-9PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHandwork, J.

This case is before the court on appeal from the Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas, which granted plaintiff-appellee’s motion for specific performance of a purported settlement agreement.

I

This is an appropriation case involving the property of Tom L. Mitchell, defendant-appellant herein (hereinafter “appellant”). Plaintiff-appellee is the Board of Commissioners of Ottawa County (hereinafter the “commissioners” or the “county”).

On September 29,1981, the commissioners instituted an appropriation action in the trial court for the ultimate purpose of installing a public sewer line across…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foust v. Valleybrook Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Morr v. CrouchOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Keener Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Ohio State Tie & Timber, Inc. v. Paris Lumber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Klever v. StowOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Centennial Plaza III Invest., L.L.C. v. Centennial Plaza I Invest., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Purex Corporation v. Willis Day Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Lindsay v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API