Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Masteller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1881PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska Circuit Court. Action for damages for malicious prosecution. There was a trial by jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Ch. J.

l. malicious prosecution: evidence before grand jury. I. The defendant was the prosecuting witness in a criminal action against the plaintiff, for maliciously burning a quantity bf hay belonging to the defendant, lhe malicious prosecution for which the plaintiff claims damages, was the prosecution of that action. Eor the purpose of showing that the action was prosecuted without reasonable cause, the plaintiff introduced as a witness one Jackson, who testified that he was foreman of the grand jury which found the indictment against the plaintiff for maliciously burning the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. McKinley v. C. & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Hendrickson v. KingsburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Adams v. LisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mentzer v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Sebastian v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  4. Carp v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. White v. International Text Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API