Legal Opinion

Harding v. United States Postal Service

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided October 2, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-2434PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is the motion of the Defendants to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The Plaintiffs quite naturally oppose the motion. The parties have filed the appropriate memoranda of law and such have been carefully reviewed by the Court.

The Plaintiffs appear to have settled on a theory for their case. The Defendants note that the action is not brought under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794a; the Plaintiffs do not allege that they are qualified handicapped employees or that they have exhausted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chapple v. Fairmont General Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hurt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  3. Harding v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. McCoy v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  5. Shelton-Riek v. StoryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API