Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Condon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 1981No. WCB 79-8395, CA 19561PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1045VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Claimant sustained an injury to his right knee which his self-insured employer maintains was not job-related. A referee found the injury occurred on the job and ordered compensation paid. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversed the referee and claimant appeals. The sole issue is compensability. On de novo review, we reinstate the referee’s order.

Claimant, a felon on parole, was employed as a temporary laborer by the Portland Bureau of Parks. He had surgery on his knee in 1978, but it was described as stable at the time of his employment by his father, a physician.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Widener v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Bush v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Matter of Compensation of PetzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Wacker Siltronic Corp. v. SatcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Ledbury v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API