Legal Opinion
Haug v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided August 24, 1979PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
The defendant, William Haug, appeals on the grounds that his second degree murder conviction must be reversed because the Trial Court erred in admitting an inculpato-ry statement, denying a motion for a continuance, and refusing a motion for a judgment of acquittal based on Haug’s contention that he lacked the required state of mind to commit the murder.
I
Shortly before 1:00 a. m. on January 19, 1974, 1 State Police officers arrived at Haug’s home. In the presence of his father, they told the defendant that he was a suspect in their investigation of the murder of Vicky…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gallegos v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Vorhauer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Rambo v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.