Blankenship v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
McNEILLY, Justice:
Defendant, Wade W. Blankenship, Jr., appeals his conviction by a Superior Court jury of First Degree Rape and First Degree Burglary. Four arguments are advanced by defendant for reversal of his convictions.
I
Initially, defendant contends that his confession was illegally obtained and erroneously admitted into evidence below because it was the product of an unconstitutional detention and coercion by the police and because the police failed to give him his Miranda warnings. Thus, we scrutinize the police conduct on which defendant bases his contention.
Detectives Brown and Cox…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Weedon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Downes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.