Legal Opinion
Deguzis v. Jandreau
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 21, 1992No. 10240PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff John Bukowski in this action in quo warranto1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant. Bukowski claims *422that the trial court (1) improperly found that the defendant met his burden of proving that he holds the position of captain in the Bristol fire department by right, and (2) improperly permitted one of the defendant’s witnesses to testify as an expert witness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant by filing a “Complaint in the Nature of Quo Warranto” dated February 26, 1991. The complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Town of Cheshire v. McKenneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Gaski v. BasileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Richmond v. LongoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Demarest v. Fire DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Dumais v. UnderwoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Geletka v. Hughes, No. 0117656 (May 3, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Kalako v. O'toole, No. Cv97 0059078s (Jul. 31, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Lackman v. Dineen, No. Cv 950050842s (Oct. 2, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995