Dumais v. Underwood
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiffs2 in *785this action brought in the nature of a quo warranto challenging the appointment of the defendants to the charter revision commission of the town of Plainville. The defendants claim that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear the quo warranto action. In the alternative, they argue that the trial court improperly (1) determined that a quo warranto action is the appropriate method to challenge the defendants’ appointment, (2) determined that the town charter is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Town of Cheshire v. McKenneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Stage v. MacKieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Caulfield v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cook-Littman v. Bd. of Selectmen of the Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Booker v. JarjuraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Pickering v. Stanchak, No. Lpl-Cv-95-0470124s (Aug. 6, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Dumais v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998