Department of Veterans Affairs v. Duerksen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
The central issue here is whether the holding of Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 [148 Cal.Rptr. 379, 582 P.2d 970], applies to Cal-Vet contracts. We hold that it does not.
In this case a veteran purchasing a home from the Department of Veterans Affairs (Department) under a Cal-Vet contract seeks to sell the home to another before having paid the contract in full. The Department, while acknowledging that the sale poses no risk to its security interest in the property, claims authority to prevent the sale and accelerate the veteran’s debt under his contract.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sweatman v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner's Ass'n v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Nadler v. California Veterans BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Brown v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Fernandez v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.