Legal Opinion

Sweatman v. Department of Veterans Affairs

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2001No. S086696PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This case concerns a claim for disability benefits under the “Home Protection Plan of Life and Disability Coverage for Cal-Vet Purchasers” (hereafter the Cal-Vet home protection plan) established by respondent Department of Veterans Affairs of the State of California (hereafter the Department) under the Veterans’ Farm and Home Purchase Act of 1974 (Mil. & Vet. Code, § 987.50 et seq., hereafter sometimes the Act), commonly called the Cal-Vet program. We granted review to address the question whether disability coverage under the Cal-Vet home protection plan is insurance that is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Title Insurance. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs v. DuerksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Singh v. Southland Stone, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Wayne v. Staples, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API