Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Maples

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 2007No. 06-742PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case concerns the constitutionality of the Emergency Income Tax Rule 2003-4 (“Emergency Rule”), adopted by the Department of Finance and Administration (DF&A) on August 29,2003, and applied in tax years 2003 and 2004. Appellee Charles R. Maples, on behalf of himself and all taxpayers similarly situated, filed this illegal-exaction lawsuit, claiming that the Emergency Rule violated the separation-of-powers doctrine and was unconstitutional. The circuit court agreed and ordered a refund to those who, like Maples, were improperly taxed in 2003 and 2004. On appeal,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Weiss v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Brewer v. FergusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. State v. GossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. K.C. Properties of N.W. Arkansas, Inc. v. Lowell Investment Partners, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Stromwall v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Devine v. MartensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Weiss v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API