Graham v. State Board of Control
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
James Graham (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to set aside a decision of respondent State Board of Control (Board) which denied his application for restitution as the victim of a violent crime (Gov. Code, §§ 13959-13969.3 (hereafter the Statute); all references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Government Code.) The Statute authorizes a crime victim and specified members of the victim’s family to obtain restitution for pecuniary loss suffered as a direct result of a criminal act. (See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- California Welfare Rights Organization v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Burnsed v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Cabral v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Gregory v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. FaillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1998