Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2006No. 2006-1146PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Jerry Chad Stollings of Kokomo, Indiana, Attorney Registration No. 0073342, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 2001.

{¶ 2} On September 27, 2005, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline considered the case on the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement pursuant to Section 11 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“BCGD Proc.Reg.”) and made findings of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. SperosOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BeelerOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. FlorezOhio Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. McCordOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Columbus Bar Association v. RosemanOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FerfoliaOhio Supreme Court · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API