People v. Pera
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial and from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment, E. N. Rector, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Defendant was informed against by the district attorney of the county of Merced for the crime of keeping a place of public resort in no-license territory for the purpose of sale in no-license territory of alcoholic liquor. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the information. Defendant made a motion in arrest of judgment and a motion for new trial, both of which motions were denied. Judgment was pronounced and, as entered in the minutes of the court, read as follows:
“It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that said defendant, G. Pera, be, and he is fined in the sum of $600, said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Commonwealth v. HolstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- People v. CavalliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. BickerstaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. TomasovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.