Woodell v. Pinehurst Surgical Clinic, P.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
Plaintiff Connie Woodell sued the defendant physicians and the clinic with which they were then associated for injuries and damage allegedly resulting from their negligent diagnosis that she was pregnant with twins, when in fact she was carrying only a single fetus. Her husband’s action is for consortium allegedly lost because of her injuries. After discovery, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the evidence raised no genuine issue of material fact against any of them. Rule 56, N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm.
Summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hutchens v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Campbell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Ledford v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2020 Ncbc 60aNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
- Campbell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.