Legal Opinion

Mather v. Barnes

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1906No. 10PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.1

This is a bill to set aside a purchase of coal lands, on the ground of misrepresentation and fraud. In the spring of 19 02 the plaintiffs, who were extensively engaged in the manufacture of iron at Cleveland and Youngstown, Ohio, were on the lookout for á body of coal lands on which they could erect a plant for the making of coke on a large scale. This was mentioned by Murray, one of their number, to R. M. Haseltine, an experienced coal man, at one time state inspector of .mines in Ohio, who was commissioned to look over the different bituminous fields; and not long…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Farnsworth v. DuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Sawyer v. PrickettSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Clapp v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Gronlund v. AnderssonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. King v. LambornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API