Legal Opinion

In Re Yanni

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Amy Yanni is an attorney licensed to practice law in both Minnesota and Massachusetts. Yanni applied for admission to the South Dakota Bar without examination under SDCL 16-16-12.1, using her Massachusetts bar membership and almost twenty years of practice to fulfill the requirements. The South Dakota Board of Bar Examiners denied her request. Yanni challenged the denial, and attempted to use her Minnesota bar membership and experience to meet the required showing. The Board of Bar Examiners again denied her application. The denials stated that the Minnesota…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Helmbolt v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fair v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re Reasonable Testing Accommodations of LaFleurSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Matter of the Petition of Luff Exploration Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API