STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANGELA MEGAN GUINN
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, Judge
Angela Megan Guinn (“Defendant”) appeals her conviction for attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, see section 195.211.1 Defendant claims that the trial court erred by not granting her motion to suppress, by admitting retail records of her purchases of pseudoephedrine (cold medicines often used in the manufacture of methamphetamine), and by rejecting her proposed duress jury instruction. Finding no merit in Defendant’s claims, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
A jury found Defendant guilty of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, and the trial court sentenced her to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- State v. MarchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MARK J. HORTON v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. STACY BIGGERSTAFFMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MICHAEL ANTHONY NUGENTMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023