MARK J. HORTON v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNancy Steffen Rahmeyer, J.
Mark J. Horton (“Petitioner”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for the removal of his name from Missouri’s sex offender registry. We affirm the trial court’s judgment because Petitioner “has been ... required” to register under the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”) 1 and, as a result, is required to register under Missouri’s Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”) 2 even though he may no longer be required to register under SORNA.
Facts and Procedural History
As the appellant, Petitioner had the responsibility to prepare a record on appeal that is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Petrovick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Liana MacColl (formerly known as Liana M. Bradford) v. Missouri State Highway Patrol and Boone County, Missouri, SheriffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2023
- State of Missouri v. Randy G. TeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2023