Legal Opinion
Scott v. Standridge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 9, 1926No. 15815PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The plaintiff in erre r, S. S. Scott, as plaintiff, instituted this action in the county court of Garvin county on the 11th day of March, 1922, to recover $572.89 as a balance alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by the defendant, F. P. Standridge. It appears that the note had been given as part of the purchase price of an automobile sold to defendant by plaintiff, and the note was secured by a cnai-tel mortgage on said automobile and a team, of mules.
After the note matured, and the defendant being unable to pay the same, the plaintiff demanded possession of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farmers' State Bank of Arkansas City v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Chadwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Salisbury v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mid Continent Motor Co. v. Art Harris Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- First Nat. Bank of Wellston v. KreuzbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Settle v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Steele v. Marlborough Hall Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Roberts v. MooneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.