Legal Opinion

Steele v. Marlborough Hall Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1929No. Docket No. 6825PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction enjoining defendant and appellant from selling the furniture and furnishings of the Marlborough Hall Apartments under the terms of a chattel mortgage executed to secure the performance of the terms of a lease, particularly the payment of the rent reserved.

Appellant’s predecessors in 1920 leased the said apartments to respondent for the term of ten years. . The lessee at that time executed to the lessors a chattel mortgage upon the furnishings and furniture contained in the apartment house as security for the performance by the lessee of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Mohr v. LanganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McAlester v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hunt v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair FranchisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Peterson v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Moskovitz v. LefrancoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Englert v. Ivac Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API