Roberts v. Mooney
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This action of malicious prosecution was brought by Otto H. Roberts, appellant against Louise Mooney and Norman B. Bartlett, respondents. At the close of the testimony, the learned trial court granted the motion of the -defendants for a directed verdict. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying a motion for a new trial. Under a single assignment of error, appellant contends that the court erred in directing the verdict.
In the case of Just v. Martin Brothers Company, 37 S. D. 470, 159 N. W. 44, 46, the elements necessary to- warrant an actio-n from malicious prosecution were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mohr v. LanganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Just v. Martin Bros. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Federal Nat. Bank v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Ely v. SuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kunz v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Mushitz v. First Bank of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Liberty Loan Corp. of Des Moines v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1984
- Mushitz v. First Bank of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990