Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Reliable Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1964No. 36868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. William and Mary Dargan, as contract purchasers of a parcel of land in Tacoma, bought from the appellant a fire insurance policy, which covered the dwelling situated on the property. The policy had a “contract of sale” clause, which named Kirby Hickey as vendor and provided that, in the event of loss, as between vendor and vendee, proceeds of the policy should be paid first to the vendor, to an amount not exceeding the balance unpaid on the contract.

The policy also contained the following provision: “Assignment of this policy shall not be valid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Russell v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Stebbins v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Robbins v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. DevonshireWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Grange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Davis v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. CLS Mortgage, Inc. v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Stanton v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API