Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Devonshire

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1932No. 23842. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action in interpleader was brought by Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against Smith, Devonshire and Capital Savings & Loan Association, as defendants, to determine to whom the proceeds of a policy of insurance in the sum of $800 should be paid.

Smith is the owner of a small tract of land at the city limits of Montesano, Washington. He had a loan from Devonshire, and, as part security for that loan, had a mortgage clause attached to his insurance policy on a small residence located on Ms property. Desiring to build another building on the same land, he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Rutherford (In Re Rutherford)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  2. Davis v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Reliable InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Midland Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. J.P. BuildersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Courson (In Re Courson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API