Hagar v. Schliess
Michigan Supreme Court
Bill by Alton J. Hagar against Frank C. Schliess and George J. Bachman, copartners, doing business as Schliess & Bachman, and others. Defendants filed a plea which was overruled with leave to answer. From a decree pro confesso for complainant, defendants appeal. On motion to reinstate the appeal after dismissal.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case is now before us upon the motion of the defendants to reinstate their appeal, upon the ground that we erred in dismissing it. The history of the proceedings and of the steps taken therein is as follows:
Complainant filed his bill of complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for lumber and material furnished by him to defendants Schliess and Bachman and used in the construction of a certain building for the defendants. To this bill the appellants filed a plea, duly verified, setting up in brief that, at the time complainant entered into the contract alleged in the bill, he was doing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wells v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Miller v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Cross v. CrossMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Painter v. Lebanon Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pinel v. CampsellMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Hager v. SchliessMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Morris v. VyseMichigan Supreme Court · 1916