Legal Opinion

Morris v. Vyse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 42Published

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Joseph C. Morris, administrator de bonis non of the estate of Charles L. Fish, deceased, against Maud A. Kuhn, Tillie Vyse and Mary A. Richards to impress a trust upon certain real estate and for an accounting. From an order overruling the plea of defendants Kuhn and Richards, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This case was before the court on a former occasion. Morris v. Vyse, 154 Mich. 253 (117 N. W. 639, 129 Am. St. Rep. 472). A sufficient statement of the facts involved will be found in that opinion. We there overruled defendants’ demurrer, and granted to them the usual time in which to answer. Instead of answering simply, they filed a plea and answer. The plea is based primarily upon the ground that the petitions filed in the probate court for the county of Wayne for the appointment of Ruggles as administrator, or for the appointment of Morris (complainant) as administrator de bonis non of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. VyseMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Snook v. PearsallMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Burnham v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Miner v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hagar v. SchliessMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API