Legal Opinion

Miller v. McLaughlin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1904No. Calendar No. 20,147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Foreclosure bill, filed in the Wayne circuit, by Sidney T. Miller, trustee, against Joseph R. McLaughlin, Collins B. Hubbard, and others:

1Per curiam

This is a suit in equity to foreclose a. *647mortgage. It is the second time the matter has been in this court, having once been heard on a demurrer to the bill. See Miller v. McLaughlin, 132 Mich. 234 (93 N. W. 435). After their demurrer was overruled, appellants interposed a plea setting up facts which, it is claimed, required the State of Michigan to be made a party. This plea was overruled, with permission to defendants to put in their answers to the bill within 15 days. From this order an appeal was taken to this court. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that said order was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Miller v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Benedict v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Cross v. CrossMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Harper v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hagar v. SchliessMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Painter v. Lebanon Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Miller v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API