Legal Opinion
Hager v. Schliess
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1915No. Docket No. 135PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Eaton; Smith, J. Bill by Alton J.- Hager against Frank C. Schliess and others to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants filed a plea to the bill. Plaintiff entered a replication, which the court struck from the files after hearing the testimony in support of the plea which the trial court held was insufficient in law. Defendants elected to abide by their plea and appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Some phases of this litigation were recently before this court. A reading of the opinion, found in 183 Mich. 610 (149 N. W. 1058), will make a long statement unnecessary here.
The case was argued at the January term of £he court. Counsel for appellants says — we quote from the brief:
*473“As we view this case there is only one question involved, viz., whether the established rules and precedents of this court relating to the practice upon and disposition of pleas in chancery are to be sustained or are to be reversed, and we shall accordingly begin our argument with a discussion of this topic.”
We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Zemon v. TrimMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Cross v. LeonardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Winget v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. BiossatMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- June v. Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967