Legal Opinion

Pinel v. Campsell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Macomb; Tappan, J., presiding. Bill by Thomas F. Pinel, individually, and as executor of 'the estate of Edgar E. Pinel, deceased, against Rachel Campsell, for an accounting and partition. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

January 30, 1914, a bill of complaint was filed in the Federal court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Herman H. Pinel and Sarah Slyfield were complainants. They brought their bill of complaint against Thomas F. Pinel individually, and also as special administrator of the estate of Edgar E. Pinel and Rachel Campsell. They averred in substance :

“That on and for some time prior to the 26th day of June, 1888, one Charles T. Pinel, the father of your orators, and also of the said defendants, was possessed in fee simple of a certain farm (describing it).

“That on or about the 26th day of June,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emry v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Alexander v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Haas v. RigheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Smith v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. McNeill v. . CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chapple v. National Hardwood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. J D Candler Roofing Co. v. DicksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Darin v. HavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Detroit United Railway v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bisceglia Motor Sales, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API