Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 12, 1984No. Nos. 79 CH 3046, 79 CH 3077 and 79 CH 5253PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

These three class actions charge various piping construction companies and individuals with bid-rigging, price-fixing and job allocation in the Chicago area from 1956 to 1977. Plaintiffs have moved (via their “Motion”) under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 37 for an order compelling defendants to answer Rule 33 interrogatories and to produce documents in compliance with a Rule 34 request. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Background

In October 1979 plaintiffs served defendants…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  3. State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. FinesilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  2. Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
  3. Robinson v. Texas Automobile Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  4. Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  5. Gingerich v. City of Elkhart Probation DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API