Legal Opinion

People v. Hutton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 22, 1992No. 91SA427PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

The People, pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, appeal the district court’s ruling, in People v. Hutton, No. 91CR747, suppressing a statement given by the defendant to a polygraph examiner. Although the district court concluded that the defendant waived his Miranda 1 rights and voluntarily gave statements prior to the polygraph examination, the court concluded that the defendant’s statement, made after the test in response to the examiner’s expressed belief that the defendant had lied, was not voluntary. The court’s reasoning was based upon a finding that, while there had been no coercion, the examiner’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. People v. RaffaelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. People v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. DraconSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API