Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Laundre
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 12, 1951PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
In April, 1945, the plaintiff, an electrical contractor, entered into a contract with the defendant to do the electrical work in connection with an artificial ice plant that the defendant was constructing. This action, which arose out of that contract, was begun in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston to recover a balance alleged to be due the plaintiff for labor and materials. The judge found for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,220.80. It is not disputed that this finding included two items of $442.89 and $438.57 which, the plaintiff contended, were due him for extra work in connection…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Godfrey v. CaswellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Mitchell v. SilversteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- DiPerrio v. Town of HoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Fine Home Builders, Inc. v. HumennMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Kovacev v. City of MedfordMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Locke v. AustinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.