Legal Opinion

DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1932PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action in contract for money had and received, or in tort for conversion. Undisputed facts are that the plaintiffs owned certain bank books representing funds deposited in the Italian Postal Savings System in Rome, Italy. These books on December 18, 1924, were handed to one Del Buono, as had been done before, to be sent by him to Italy to have the interest added and the books returned to the plaintiffs. Del Buono, being in financial difficulties, forged the names of the plaintiffs to as many powers of attorney as there were bank books and sold the bank books to the defendant on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Adams v. DickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Memishian v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Biggs v. DensmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API