Legal Opinion
Locke v. Austin
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided November 9, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A, Rule 8C, appeal by the defendant-tenant of the trial court’s failure to rule on all of her summary process counterclaims.
The record indicates that on November 1,1997, the parties executed a one year written lease for a single family home at 186 Montvale Avenue in Woburn at a rent of $1,800.00 per month. The property had two driveways and a third "auxiliary” access road leading to the rear of the house. The premises consisted of both the “land and the buildings thereon,” and the lease provided that “whenever possible, Tenant shall be informed in advance of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Calimlim v. Foreign Car Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Szalla v. LockeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bollen v. Camp KingsmontMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Interama, Inc. v. QuieriMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Saab v. Norton Family, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Zimbovsky v. TokarMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
- Rockland Trust Co. v. LangoneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.