Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Hopson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 17, 1940PublishedCited by 237 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
On February 27, 1939, the plaintiff’s first motion to amend his bill by substituting a new draft was allowed. The defendants Hopson and Mange were not residents of the Commonwealth, were not served with process, and did not appear. The other defendants demurred. On March 30, 1939, an interlocutory decree was entered by a judge of‘the Superior Court, overruling the demurrer. On April 1, 1939, the demurring defendants appealed. On April 6, 1939, the judge denied the motion of the demurring defendants that the case be reported under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 30. On July 19, 1939, an amendment…
2Cases cited132 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Manuel M. Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, Fred Vogel, and C.R. PatyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.