Legal Opinion
Kovacev v. City of Medford
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 2, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
This is a negligence action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Robert Kovacev as the result of a fall. The trial court found for the defendants, and the plaintiff now claims on this appeal to be aggrieved by the court’s rulings on his requests for rulings of law, “by the fact that the court made general conclusions of law and called them findings of fact,” and by the denial of his motion for a new trial.
The reported evidence indicates that defendant Middlesex Corporation (“Mid-dlesex”) entered into a contract with defendant City of Medford (“Medford”) to replace the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Cimino v. Milford Keg, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Ashapa v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cambridge Chamber of Commerce v. Central Square Insurance Agency, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Fillion v. CardinalMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Fine Home Builders, Inc. v. HumennMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Back Bay Travel Agency, Inc. v. BennettMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Keene v. MoylanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.