Legal Opinion

Millick v. Peer

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1955No. Civ. A. 21PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $310.72, under a contract of sale of an automobile. The agreed purchase price was $1,195. Among other things, the contract shows that a charge of $24 was made for "TR. Lie. ’ ’ It may be inferred that this item covered fees for transfer. The contract provided that, in the event of default, the seller might repossess the automobile ; resell the same at a private sale; and hold the purchaser for the balance due. It was also stated in the contract that “the receipt of a copy of this contract is hereby acknowledged by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bowden v. Sussex Studebaker, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. Williams v. Caruso Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Baum v. AlemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. McMillen v. PippinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API