Millick v. Peer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, P. J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $310.72, under a contract of sale of an automobile. The agreed purchase price was $1,195. Among other things, the contract shows that a charge of $24 was made for "TR. Lie. ’ ’ It may be inferred that this item covered fees for transfer. The contract provided that, in the event of default, the seller might repossess the automobile ; resell the same at a private sale; and hold the purchaser for the balance due. It was also stated in the contract that “the receipt of a copy of this contract is hereby acknowledged by…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bowden v. Sussex Studebaker, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1960
- Williams v. Caruso Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Baum v. AlemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- McMillen v. PippinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963