Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Sussex Studebaker, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 2, 1960No. Rule 3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stiftel, J.:

On December 23, 1957, Larry Bowden, the petitioner, purchased a used 1950 Buick 4-door sedan from the defendant, Sussex Studebaker, Inc. (Sussex), for the sum of $328.42. Bowden paid Sussex $100 cash and signed a judgment note for the balance, and at the same time executed a conditional sales contract with Sussex. The balance of $228.42, which included financing and insurance charges, was to be paid in six monthly installments of $38.07 each. As a consequence of Bowden’s failure to pay any installment, the defendant repossessed the 1950 Buick on March 11, 1958.

Sussex then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  2. H. L. Braham & Co. v. ZittelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Ellner v. Commercial Credit Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930
  4. Millick v. PeerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation v. SwiderskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  3. State v. PrestonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. United Securities Corporation v. TomlinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1964
  5. FARMERS BANK OF STATE OF DELAWARE v. OdomSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API