Legal Opinion

Holland v. Universal Underwriters Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1969No. Civ. 32373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.

Plaintiff, a minor, appeals from a judgment declaring that a certain liability policy issued to him by the defendant Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (“Universal”) does not include uninsured motorist coverage. (Ins. Code, § 11580.2.)

The facts are quite simple. Plaintiff, then 16 years old, purchased a motorcycle from one Darby, who was the owner of B & D Enterprises. At that time he signed an application for insurance. The application form shows two of plaintiff’s signatures. The upper signature appears in the middle of the page, below a schedule which sets forth a premium of $55 for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mission Insurance v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hendricks v. Meritplan InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Peers v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Pollock v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Valdez v. Federal Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Abbott v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Pechtel v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. I.B. ex rel. Fife v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Hagar v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API